4.7 Article

An addressable electrowetting valve for centrifugal microfluidics

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 369, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132276

关键词

Centrifugal microfluidics; Valve; Electrowetting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Centrifugal microfluidic platforms integrate and perform complex biological and chemical processes within disc-like substrates and valving using centrifugal forces and the Coriolis effect. Researchers have developed and tested an addressable electrowetting centrifugal (EWC) valve, which can be triggered to open by altering its wettability through an external electric field. The valve demonstrates good performance in multiple operations on different fluid samples.
Centrifugal microfluidic platforms aim to integrate and perform complex biological and chemical processes within disc-like substrates and valving through centrifugal forces and the Coriolis effect. Although the integration of active valves within such system can be used to enhance fluid control, the ability to fabricate and integrate addressable valves within centrifugal platforms remains a significant challenge. To address this issue, herein, we present and test an addressable electrowetting centrifugal (EWC) valve. The EWC valve comprises a hydrophobic burst valve, integrated side electrodes and a dielectric layer between the microfluidic channel and electrode structures. The burst valve is made from a hydrophobic material able hold a specified pressure. Specifically, application of an external electric field is used to alter the valve wettability, making the valve more hydrophilic, decreasing the threshold pressure and triggering the opening of the valve. To assess valve performance, we investigate the influence of electric properties and channel geometry on valve response and then demonstrate multiple operations on different fluid samples. Finally, and to highlight the utility of EWC valves, we demonstrate the detection and analysis of CD4 human immune cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据