4.7 Article

Ultrasensitive sensing of T4 PNK phosphatase activity through establishing a novel transcription-based signal amplification platform

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 369, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132269

关键词

Isothermal amplification; High-efficiency transcription; T4 Polynucleotide Kinase phosphatase activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21705118]
  2. National Science Foundation of Tianjin [19ZXDBSY00070, 20YFZCSY00990]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a highly sensitive and selective transcription-based signal amplification method was developed for trace nucleic acid detection. The method utilizes the advantages of long template synthesis and self-amplification, and can be further modified for the detection of other analytical targets.
Signal amplification plays a significant role in nucleic acid analysis, especially in trace nucleic acid detection. Transcription-based signal amplification is a very important component in the field of signal amplification, and has received extensive attention depending on outstanding cyclic transcription ability. However, the low efficiency of transcription caused by limited template length usually restricts their further applications significantly. Herein, we developed a transcription-based signal amplification method with high sensitivity and selectivity. The approach we proposed couples the advantageous features of long template synthesis from phosphorothioated-terminal hairpin formation and self-priming extension (PS-THSP) with self-amplification from cell-free transcription system. The results demonstrate that this approach can be applied to quantify T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (T4 PNK) phosphatase activity in a broad range from 0.00001 to 0.01 U/mL, with a detection limit of 8.1 x 10(-6) U/mL. Moreover, this device can be further employed as a superior signal amplification platform for the detection of other analytical targets after moderate modifications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据