4.6 Article

High-Sensitivity Optical Fiber-Based Glucose Sensor Using Helical Intermediate-Period Fiber Grating

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22186824

关键词

helical intermediate-period fiber grating; optical fiber sensor; glucose detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [62175165, 61905165, 61905164]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2021A1515011834, 2019A050510047]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [RCBS20200714114922296, JCYJ20210324120403009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an all-fiber glucose sensor based on a helical intermediate-period fiber grating (HIPFG) was proposed and demonstrated. The sensor exhibits easy fabrication, high flexibility, insensitivity to temperature, and good stability, showing great potential for long-term and compact biosensors.
An all-fiber glucose sensor is proposed and demonstrated based on a helical intermediate-period fiber grating (HIPFG) produced by using a hydrogen/oxygen flame heating method. The HIPFG, with a grating length of 1.7 cm and a period of 35 mu m, presents four sets of double dips with low insertion losses and strong coupling strengths in the transmission spectrum. The HIPFG possesses an averaged refractive index (RI) sensitivity of 213.6 nm/RIU nm/RIU in the RI range of 1.33-1.36 and a highest RI sensitivity of 472 nm/RIU at RI of 1.395. In addition, the HIPFG is demonstrated with a low-temperature sensitivity of 3.67 pm/degrees C, which promises a self-temperature compensation in glucose detection. In the glucose-sensing test, the HIPFG sensor manifests a detection sensitivity of 0.026 nm/(mg/mL) and a limit of detection (LOD) of 1 mg/mL. Moreover, the HIPFG sensor exhibits good stability in 2 h, indicating its capacity for long-time detection. The properties of easy fabrication, high flexibility, insensitivity to temperature, and good stability of the proposed HIPFG endow it with a promising potential for long-term and compact biosensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据