4.6 Article

Model for Managing the Integration of a Vehicle-to-Home Unit into an Intelligent Home Energy Management System

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22218142

关键词

demand side management; electric vehicle; home energy management system; home automation; multi-agent system; vehicle-to-home

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the integration of V2H centralized photovoltaic systems and proposes an HCPV scheduling algorithm to improve energy sustainability in smart homes. A multi-agent system ensures proper system operation and meets the power requirements of various devices. Experimental results demonstrate the potential benefits of V2H technology as a unit storage solution.
Integration of vehicle-to-home (V2H) centralized photovoltaic (HCPV) systems is a requested and potentially fruitful research topic for both industry and academia. Renewable energy sources, such as wind turbines and solar photovoltaic panels, alleviate energy deficits. Furthermore, energy storage technologies, such as batteries, thermal, and electric vehicles, are indispensable. Consequently, in this article, we examine the impact of solar photovoltaic (SPV), microgrid (MG) storage, and an electric vehicle (EV) on maximum sun radiation hours. As a result, an HCPV scheduling algorithm is developed and applied to maximize energy sustainability in a smart home (SH). The suggested algorithm can manage energy demand between the MG and SPV systems, as well as the EV as a mobile storage system. The model is based on several limitations to meet households' electrical needs during sunny and cloudy weather. A multi-agent system (MAS) is undertaken to ensure proper system operation and meet the power requirements of various devices. An experimental database for weather and appliances is deployed to evaluate and control energy consumption and production cost parameters. The obtained results illustrate the benefits of V2H technology as a prospective unit storage solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据