4.3 Review

Efficacy and safety of perampanel in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

期刊

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 54-60

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.09.020

关键词

Perampanel; Epilepsy; Safety; Efficacy; Systematic review; Meta-analysis and drug safety; Antiepileptic drugs; Antiseizure medications; e2007; Fycompa; Adverse events

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review examines the effectiveness and safety of Perampanel in treating epilepsy. The results show a significant reduction in seizures and a potential increase in discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most commonly reported TEAEs are non-threatening, but there is a possibility of rare but serious adverse psychological outcomes.
Background: Perampanel a third-generation antiseizure medication, belongs to a new promising class of drugs called AMPA receptor antagonists, approved to treat focal-onset seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic clonic seizures and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.Methods: This review included RCTs on patients with epilepsy exposed to perampanel compared with placebo, or one or more pre-existing antiseizure medications. Four databases and two clinical trial registries were searched from inception to July 2021. Included outcomes were 50% responder rate, seizure-free rate, discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE)s, having any TEAEs, and most reported TEAEs. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the internal validity of the included RCTs. Results: From 2211 retrieved citations, eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Fifty-percent responder and seizure freedom rates were significantly higher in patients receiving perampanel when compared to placebo (RR 1.57, 95 % CI 1.35 to 1.82, I2 15% and RR 2.79, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.93, I2 7%, respectively). The 50% responder rates for 8mg and 12 mg, when compared to placebo, were similar. The most-reported TEAEs were dizziness and somnolence with <1% reporting serious psychological outcomes. Conclusion: This systematic review reports significant reduction in seizures and a potential dose-based increase in discontinuations due to TEAE. The most-reported TEAEs were non-threatening, with the possibility of rare but serious adverse psychological outcomes. Further independent RCTs studying the most efficient dose for efficacy and safety are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据