4.7 Article

Comparison of Global Cerebral Blood Flow Measured by Phase-Contrast Mapping MRI with 15O-H2O Positron Emission Tomography

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 692-699

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25442

关键词

cerebral blood flow; phase-contrast mapping; positron emission tomography

资金

  1. Danish Council of Independent Research [10-094110]
  2. University of Copenhagen
  3. Lundbeck Foundation through the Center for Neurovascular Signaling (LUCENS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To compare mean global cerebral blood flow (CBF) measured by phase-contrast mapping magnetic resonance imaging (PCM MRI) and by O-15-H2O positron emission tomography (PET) in healthy subjects. PCM MRI is increasingly being used to measure mean global CBF, but has not been validated in vivo against an accepted reference technique. Materials and Methods: Same-day measurements of CBF by O-15-H2O PET and subsequently by PCM MRI were performed on 22 healthy young male volunteers. Global CBF by PET was determined by applying a one-tissue compartment model with measurement of the arterial input function. Flow was measured in the internal carotid and vertebral arteries by a noncardiac triggered PCM MRI sequence at 3T. The measured flow was normalized to total brain weight determined from a volume-segmented 3D T-1-weighted anatomical MR-scan. Results: Mean CBF was 34.93.4mL/100g/min measured by O-15-H2O PET and 57.06.8mL/100g/min measured by PCM MRI. The measurements were highly correlated (P=0.0008, R-2=0.44), although values obtained by PCM MRI were higher compared to O-15-H2O PET (absolute and relative differences were 22.05.2mL/100g/min and 63.4 +/- 14.8%, respectively). Conclusion: This study confirms the use of PCM MRI for quantification of global CBF, but also that PCM MRI systematically yields higher values relative to O-15-H2O PET, probably related to methodological bias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据