4.2 Article

Drug resistance in NSCLC is associated with tumor micro-environment

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.repbio.2022.100680

关键词

Single-cell RNA sequencing; Tumor microenvironment; Non-small cell lung cancer; Resistance; CD24

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82003142]
  2. Construction project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging [18DZ2260400]
  3. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [81830052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we identified a link between drug resistance and the tumor microenvironment (TME) using single-cell transcriptome sequencing data. We found that CD24 and CYP1B1 may play key roles in regulating drug resistance development in tumor cells by altering the TME.
Background: Tumor cell resistance to chemotherapy is the most critical factor that influences the prognosis of cancer patients. It is generally believed that drug resistance is caused by genetic alterations in tumor cells; however, the relationship between drug resistance and the tumor microenvironment (TME) has not been adequately studied. Herein, we successfully identified drug resistance and sensitivity clusters using single-cell transcriptome sequencing data from GSE149383 and established a proportional hazards model to find genes that affected prognosis. The results showed that marker genes between resistant and sensitive clusters were significantly associated with the TME; additionally, the model showed good reliability. Furthermore, we used bulk RNA-seq data to analyze the expression of CD24 and CYP1B1, which revealed little difference in the levels of the two genes in normal and tumor tissues but a significant difference in their expression between drug-resistant and -sensitive cells. In conclusion, our study demonstrated a link between drug resistance and the TME, and we found that CD24 and CYP1B1 may be key regulators of drug resistance development in tumor cells via altering the TME.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据