4.7 Article

Microwave assisted steam reforming in a high efficiency catalytic reactor

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 893-901

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.157

关键词

Microwaves; Electrification of chemical engineering; Process intensification; Distributed hydrogen production; Methane steam reforming; Structured catalysts

资金

  1. PRIN (Progetti di ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale) [2020N38E75]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, hydrogen production in the EU relies heavily on methane steam reforming from natural gas, which results in significant CO2 emissions. However, the use of microwave-assisted reformers shows promise in achieving higher efficiency and lower energy consumption for hydrogen production.
The current H2 production in the EU (>27 kt/d) is almost entirely from natural gas via Methane Steam Reforming (MSR), a strongly endothermic catalytic process, carried out in packed-bed tubular reformers at 750-900 degrees C, with considerable CO2 emissions. In this context, the application of renewable electricity to MSR offers interesting perspectives for a reduced environmental footprint. The use of microwaves (MW) may result in efficient and faster method for generating the heat directly inside the catalytic volume. In this work, the role of the reactor configuration in the MW-assisted MSR has been investigated, by performing dedicated experimental tests in which a Ni-based catalyst (7 wt% with respect to the washcoat), prepared starting by silicon carbide monoliths, was tested in two different reactors. The results showed that the CH4 conversion showed a good approach to the thermodynamic equilibrium values starting at about 750 degrees C at a value of gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 5000 h-1 in the tests performed with the optimized reactor configuration. The energy efficiency of the two systems was about 50% and 73%, for the classical and optimized configuration respectively, and the latter had an energy consumption of 2.5 kWh/Nm3H2 at 750 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据