4.7 Article

Hydrodeoxygenation of lignin biophenolics to cyclohexanes over sub-nanometric Ru multifunctional catalyst

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 724-733

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.090

关键词

Lignin; Hydrodeoxygenation; Biophenolics; Sub-nanometric Ru; Cyclohexanes

资金

  1. National Key Research and Devel-opment Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. [2019YFC1906700]
  4. [31971607]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A catalyst composed of low-loading, sub-nanoscaled Ru species and multifarious acidic centers on amorphous-silica-alumina is reported, showing excellent activity, selectivity, and stability in the hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived phenolics into cyclohexanes. The catalytic performance is linearly related to the total acidities of the catalyst, indicating a synergistic interaction between the metallic and acidic components, enabling the efficient conversion of lignin-derived compounds into cyclohexanes.
Hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived phenolics into cyclohexanes is recognized as an attractive philosophy for producing high energy density fuels in a sustainable manner. Here, we report a catalyst made of low-loading, sub-nanoscaled Ru species and multifarious acidic centers on amorphous-silica-alumina, which shows excel-lent activity, selectivity, and stability in hydrodeoxygenation of 4-propylguaiacol to propylcyclohexane. Catalytic performance exhibits a linear relationship to the total acidities of this family catalysts, demonstrating a syner-gistic interaction between the metallic and acidic components. The superior performance of this catalyst allows the conversion of various lignin-derived monophenols, dimers, more significantly, a biophenolic stream from miscanthus lignin into cyclohexanes with high efficiency and yield. This work highlights the importance of the sub-nanometric size of Ru species in the advancement of efficient and affordable approaches towards lignin -based fuel production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据