4.8 Review

Wind tunnel tests for wind turbines: A state-of-the-art review

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112675

关键词

Miniature wind turbine; Wind tunnel tests; Complex terrain; Wake steering

资金

  1. Research Institute for Sustainable Urban Development (RISUD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a comprehensive overview and in-depth discussion on wind turbine experiments in wind tunnels, covering various aspects such as pre-experimental preparations, wind tunnel tests on different terrains, and wake behavior studies, offering important insights for solving theoretical problems and practical research in wind energy.
Wind turbine (WT) experiments in wind tunnels can benefit the efficient utilization of wind energy in many aspects, such as the testing of new products, the validation of numerical models, and the exploration of underlying mechanisms of WT-induced flow field. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and critical review on this topic. In this paper, necessary pre-experimental works are presented first in terms of the design process of miniature WT, scaling criteria, blockage correction, and devices and methods for measurement. In addition, the wind tunnel tests on flat and complex terrains are discussed for in-depth understanding. The dynamic wake behaviors in both near wake and far wake are reviewed with the clarification of two hypotheses of wake meandering. Careful microsite selections of WTs on complex terrain can be beneficial for the total power yields. Furthermore, special attention is paid to active yaw control to verify the potential to increase power output while mitigating structural loads. Finally, discussion on research limitations and prospects are given as avenues for future research. This study provides a comprehensive overview and in-depth discussion on WT experiments in wind tunnels, which is expected to facilitate the solution of theoretical problems in wind energy and enable more practical research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据