4.4 Article

Determination of Lethality Curve for Cobalt-60 Gamma-Radiation Source in Rhesus Macaques Using Subject-Based Supportive Care

期刊

RADIATION RESEARCH
卷 198, 期 6, 页码 599-614

出版社

RADIATION RESEARCH SOC
DOI: 10.1667/RADE-22-00101.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [AAI12044-001-07000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to establish a lethality curve for total-body irradiation using a cobalt-60 gamma-radiation source in nonhuman primates. The results will be valuable for testing radiation countermeasures in rhesus macaques with subject-based supportive care.
Well-characterized and validated animal models are required for the development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) for acute radiation syndrome to mitigate injury due to high doses of total- or partial-body irradiation. Animal models used in MCM development must reflect a radiation dose- and time-dependent relationship, clinical presentation, and pathogenesis of organ injuries in humans. The objective of the current study was to develop the lethality curve for the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute high level cobalt-60 gamma-radiation source in nonhuman primates (NHPs) after total-body irradiation. A dose-response relationship was determined using NHPs (rhesus macaques, N = 36, N = 6/radiation dose) irradiated with 6 doses in the range of 6.0 to 8.5 Gy, with 0.5 Gy increments at a dose rate of 0.6 Gy/min. Animals were provided subject-based supportive care including blood transfusions and were monitored for 60 days postirradiation. Survival was the primary endpoint of the study and the secondary endpoint included hematopoietic recovery. The lethality curve suggested LD30/60, LD50/60, and LD70/60 values as 5.71, 6.78, and 7.84 Gy, respectively. The results of this study will be valuable to provide specific doses for various lethalities of Co-60-gamma radiation to test radiation countermeasures in rhesus macaques using subject-based supportive care including blood transfusion. (C) 2022 by Radiation Research Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据