4.5 Review

Diverse multi-week physical activity programs reduce ADHD symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102268

关键词

Exercise; Child behavior disorders; Problem behaviors; Mental health

资金

  1. University of Illinois Chicago Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that physical activity can be used as an adjunct treatment and secondary prevention intervention for ADHD and ODD, reducing symptoms and functional impairment. The results support the positive effects of physical activity in alleviating ADHD symptoms, and various forms of physical activity can be beneficial.
Objective: Physical activity (PA) has been proposed as an adjunct treatment and secondary prevention interovention for attention-deficit hyperactivity/impulsivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). However, meta-analyses testing effects on symptoms and functional impairment have yielded conflicting results. Methods: A systematic search of eight databases yielded 15 randomized controlled trial and 2 quasi-experimental design studies-including N = 881 youth (M = 9.75 years, 71% male)-that tested the effects of multi-week PA programs on symptoms and impairment of children with [or at-risk for] ADHD and/or ODD. Results: Random effects meta-analyses favored PA groups on omnibus ADHD measures (g = 0.42, 95%CI[-0.62;-0.21]), combined ADHD symptoms (g = 0.50, 95%CI[-0.82;-0.17]), inattention (g = 0.41,95%CI[-0.82; 0.00]), and hyperactivity/impulsivity (g = 0.30, 95%CI[-0.56;-0.04]). Heterogeneity was moderate across studies (I2 = 49%, 95%CI[12%-to-70%]). Significant differences favored PA programs whether inclusion required diagnosis, programs augmented frontline treatments, and active or passive comparison groups were utilized. Conclusion: Diverse PA programs can reduce ADHD symptoms, especially where they intentionally pursue this end.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据