4.5 Review

Data-independent acquisition proteomics methods for analyzing post-translational modifications

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 23, 期 7-8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202200046

关键词

data-independent acquisition; glycosylation; post-translational modifications; site localization; spectral library; LC-MS; MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) increase the functional diversity of the cellular proteome. Accurate quantification and identification of protein PTMs is crucial in proteomics research. Recent advancements in data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry (MS) have enabled deep coverage and accurate quantification of PTMs. This review provides an overview of DIA data processing methods for PTMs analysis, as well as deep learning methods that enhance PTMs analysis. The limitations and future directions of DIA methods for PTMs analysis are also discussed.
Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) increase the functional diversity of the cellular proteome. Accurate and high throughput identification and quantification of protein PTMs is a key task in proteomics research. Recent advancements in data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry (MS) technology have achieved deep coverage and accurate quantification of proteins and PTMs. This review provides an overview of DIA data processing methods that cover three aspects of PTMs analysis, that is, detection of PTMs, site localization, and characterization of complex modification moieties, such as glycosylation. In addition, a survey of deep learning methods that boost DIA-based PTMs analysis is presented, including in silico spectral library generation, as well as feature scoring and error rate control. The limitations and future directions of DIA methods for PTMs analysis are also discussed. Novel data analysis methods will take advantage of advanced MS instrumentation techniques to empower DIA MS for in-depth and accurate PTMs measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据