4.6 Article

BayeStab: Predicting effects of mutations on protein stability with uncertainty quantification

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pro.4467

关键词

concrete dropout; graph neural network; protein stability change; uncertainty quantification; web server

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62104034]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [F2020501033]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2223032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predicting changes in protein thermostability upon mutation is crucial for disease understanding and drug design. This study leverages advances in graph neural networks and Bayesian neural networks to tackle this prediction task. The method is validated on test datasets, showing strong generalization and symmetry performance, and provides insights into the inherent noise of the training datasets through uncertainty decomposition.
Predicting protein thermostability change upon mutation is crucial for understanding diseases and designing therapeutics. However, accurately estimating Gibbs free energy change of the protein remained a challenge. Some methods struggle to generalize on examples with no homology and produce uncalibrated predictions. Here we leverage advances in graph neural networks for protein feature extraction to tackle this structure-property prediction task. Our method, BayeStab, is then tested on four test datasets, including S669, S611, S350, and Myoglobin, showing high generalization and symmetry performance. Meanwhile, we apply concrete dropout enabled Bayesian neural networks to infer plausible models and estimate uncertainty. By decomposing the uncertainty into parts induced by data noise and model, we demonstrate that the probabilistic method allows insights into the inherent noise of the training datasets, which is closely relevant to the upper bound of the task. Finally, the BayeStab web server is created and can be found at: . The code for this work is available at: .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据