4.7 Article

Separation and recovery of scandium from high pressure sulfuric acid leach liquor of limonitic laterite

期刊

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 161-172

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.06.028

关键词

Limonitic laterite; Separation and recovery; Solvent extraction; Scandium

资金

  1. National Key Research and Devel- opment Program of China [2021YFC2902501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51974025, 52034002]
  3. Funda- mental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-MP-20-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A process for separation and recovery of Sc from high pressure acid leach (HPAL) liquor of limonitic laterite was proposed. Through precipitation and leaching, Sc can be efficiently recovered from limonitic laterite.
Extraction of Sc from Sc-rich limonitic laterite without interfering with the main nickel-cobalt production circuit will significantly enhance the economic value of laterite. A process for separation and recovery of Sc from high pressure acid leach (HPAL) liquor of limonitic laterite was proposed in this paper. Based on the chemical composition of the leach liquor, precipitation thermodynamic analysis and experiments were conducted. The results indicated that after a first step to precipitate Fe3+ at pH = 2.5 and 90 degrees C, Sc could be enriched through a second step precipitate at pH = 4.8 and 60 degrees C to 267 g/t in Sc-containing precipitate. Then, Sc was re-leached from the Sc-containing precipitate via 1 mol/L sulfuric acid at L:S ratio of 5 mL/g, 80 degrees C, and 40 min. Meanwhile, gypsum in the Sc-containing precipitate transformed into calcium sulfate hemihydrate during leaching. After that, Sc was synergistically extracted from the leach solution via 5% P204 and 2.5% TBP. Moreover, impurities extracted into the organic phase during the extraction of Sc were scrubbed by HCl. Finally, Sc was stripped by NaOH. By using this process, Sc could be efficiently recovered from limonitic laterite in a facile way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据