4.8 Article

Estimation of functional diversity and species traits from ecological monitoring data

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2118156119

关键词

functional diversity; ecological monitoring; data science; diffusion map; phytoplankton

资金

  1. Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony HIFMB Project
  2. Volkswagen Foundation [ZN3285]
  3. German Research Foundation [FOR 2716]
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF Germany Project PEKRIS II [03F0828]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring functional diversity is crucial in addressing climate change and biodiversity loss. This study demonstrates the use of diffusion maps to reconstruct species traits directly from monitoring data and estimate functional diversity. The wider application of this method to existing data could greatly advance the analysis of changes in functional biodiversity.
The twin crises of climate change and biodiversity loss define a strong need for functional diversity monitoring. While the availability of high-quality ecological monitoring data is increasing, the quantification of functional diversity so far requires the identification of species traits, for which data are harder to obtain. However, the traits that are relevant for the ecological function of a species also shape its performance in the environment and hence, should be reflected indirectly in its spatiotemporal distribution. Thus, it may be possible to reconstruct these traits from a sufficiently extensive monitoring dataset. Here, we use diffusion maps, a deterministic and de facto parameter-free analysis method, to reconstruct a proxy representation of the species' traits directly from monitoring data and use it to estimate functional diversity. We demonstrate this approach with both simulated data and real-world phytoplankton monitoring data from the Baltic Sea. We anticipate that wider application of this approach to existing data could greatly advance the analysis of changes in functional biodiversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据