4.8 Article

Dissociable rhythmic mechanisms enhance memory for conscious and nonconscious perceptual contents

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2211147119

关键词

high-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation; conscious awareness; unconscious processing; short-term memory; neural rhythms

资金

  1. NIH [R01-MH114877, R01-AG063775]
  2. Spanish State Research Agency through BCBL Severo Ochoa excellence accreditation [CEX2020-001010-S]
  3. Basque Government through the BERC 2022-2025 program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the neural mechanisms of conscious and unconscious experience is a crucial goal in neuroscience. In this study, researchers used noninvasive electrical stimulation to target the early visual cortex and identified distinct mechanisms for memory processing of conscious and unconscious perception. The findings contribute to existing theories of consciousness, call for revisions to these theories, and offer potential therapeutic interventions for enhancing visual cortical processing.
Understanding the neural mechanisms of conscious and unconscious experience is a major goal of fundamental and translational neuroscience. Here, we target the early visual cortex with a protocol of noninvasive, high-resolution alternating current stimulation while participants performed a delayed target-probe discrimination task and reveal dissociable mechanisms of mnemonic processing for conscious and unconscious perceptual contents. Entraining beta-rhythms in bilateral visual areas preferentially enhanced short-term memory for seen information, whereas a-entrainment in the same region preferentially enhanced short-term memory for unseen information. The shortterm memory improvements were frequency-specific and long-lasting. The results add a mechanistic foundation to existing theories of consciousness, call for revisions to these theories, and contribute to the development of nonpharmacological therapeutics for improving visual cortical processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据