4.7 Article

Functionalized Natural Tannins For Preparation of a novel non-isocyanate polyurea-based adhesive

期刊

POLYMER TESTING
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107853

关键词

Tannin -based adhesive; Renewable materials; Non-isocyanate; Polyurea; Plywood

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, concerns over the shortcomings of conventional resin-bonded products have led researchers to develop a new generation of adhesives derived from natural renewable biomass resources. In this study, a novel epoxidized tannin-based non-isocyanate polyurea adhesive was prepared and its structure, molecular weight, and thermal degradation behavior were investigated. The mechanical properties and water resistance of the produced plywood were evaluated, showing that the adhesive possesses ideal bonding strength and excellent water resistance, making it suitable for potential applications under harsh conditions.
In recent years, the shortcomings of products bonded with adhesives of conventional resins (e.g. ureaformaldehyde, phenol-formaldehyde, melamine-based) have raised concerns as people have become more environmentally conscious while fossil resources are in short supply. This has prompted researchers to develop a new generation of adhesives derived from natural renewable biomass resources, with excellent properties and no or limited contamination. In this study, a novel epoxidized tannin-based non-isocyanate polyurea adhesive was prepared from natural tannin after functionalization with epichlorhydrin. The structure, molecular weight, and thermal degradation behavior of this resin adhesive synthesized in this way, were investigated using FT-IR, ESIMS, GPC, and TGA, respectively. The mechanical properties and water resistance of the produced plywood were evaluated. It was found that the adhesive possess ideal bonding strength and excellent water resistance, and the prepared plywood can have potential application prospects under harsh conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据