4.5 Review

Stimuli-accelerated polymeric drug delivery systems

期刊

POLYMER INTERNATIONAL
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 5-19

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pi.6474

关键词

drug delivery system; stimuli; polymer; cleavable

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The controlled delivery of pharmaceutical ingredients to disease sites is challenging, especially when crossing biological barriers. Responsive delivery systems have been developed to achieve controlled drug release based on internal or external stimuli such as pH changes, redox environment, light, and temperature. This review describes exciting developments of pH-, light-, and redox-cleavable polymers for smart delivery systems and discusses the different stimuli and polymers used for controlled drug release.
The controlled delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients to the site of disease represents a major challenge in drug therapy. Particularly when drugs have to be transported across biological barriers, suitable drug delivery systems are of importance. In recent years responsive delivery systems have been developed which enable a controlled drug release depending on internal or external stimuli such as changes in pH, redox environment or light and temperature. In some studies delivery systems with reactivity against two different stimuli were established either to enhance the response by synergies of the stimuli or to broaden the window of possible trigger events. In the present review numerous exciting developments of pH-, light- and redox-cleavable polymers suitable for the preparation of smart delivery systems are described. The review discusses the different stimuli that can be used for a controlled drug release of polymer-based delivery systems. It puts a focus on the different polymers described for the preparation of stimuli-sensitive systems, their preparation techniques as well as their stimuli-responsive degradation. (c) 2022 The Authors. Polymer International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Industrial Chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据