4.7 Article

Investigation of the way to enhance the synergistic effect between polyimide and graphene on the tribological performance of polytetrafluoroethylene composites

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 43, 期 11, 页码 8426-8436

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.27013

关键词

graphene; PI; PTFE; synergistic effect; tribology

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2022YFE0199100]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020QE162]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the synergistic effect of polyimide and graphene on the friction and wear of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) composites using two different preparation methods. The results show that incorporating graphene into polyimide first enhances the wear resistance, while blending graphene and PTFE first has a less significant effect. Graphene fillers are not easily washed away by the plastic flow of PTFE resin and accumulate on the wear surface, leading to better synergistic effect.
In this article, two different preparation methods were employed to explore the way to maximize the synergistic effect between polyimide (PI) and graphene (Gr) on the friction and wear of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) composites. Results indicate that the incorporation of Gr into PI firstly is more beneficial for the improvement of tribological performance rather than the blending of Gr and PTFE firstly. The incorporation of Gr into PI firstly enhances the wear resistance of PI/Gr phases. Gr fillers is not taken away easily by the plastic flow of PTFE resin and Gr will accumulate on the wear surface of PI/Gr. The synergistic effect of PI and Gr will play a better role in the friction and wear of PTFE/PI/Gr. However, the wear performance of PI phases cannot be enhanced effectively by the blending of Gr and PTFE firstly. And Gr will be taken away by the severe wear of PTFE phases in PTFE/Gr/PI. Only tiny Gr accumulates on the wear surface of PI phases, the synergistic effect of PI and Gr will not play a better role in friction and wear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据