4.6 Article

Intracellular cytokine detection based on flow cytometry in hemocytes from Galleria mellonella larvae: A new protocol

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274120

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2019/35/D/NZ6/01685]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invertebrates are increasingly used for studying the immune system, as their innate immunity shows similarity to mammals. This study aimed to develop a protocol for detecting cytokines in Galleria mellonella larvae hemocytes using flow cytometry. The study successfully developed a reproducible protocol by optimizing various steps, which will facilitate further immunological research using insect cells.
Invertebrates are becoming increasingly popular models for research on the immune system. The innate immunity possessed by insects shows both structural and functional similarity to the resistance displayed by mammals, and many processes occurring in insect hemocytes are similar to those that occur in mammals. However, the use of insects as research models requires the development of methods for working with hemocytes. The aim of this study was to develop a protocol for intracellular cytokine detection in Galleria mellonella larvae hemocytes based on flow cytometry. It describes the anticoagulant composition of the buffer, the optimal conditions for hemocyte permeabilization and fixation, as well as the conditions of cell centrifugation to prevent cell disintegration. A key element is the selection of staining conditions, especially the length of the incubation time with the primary antibody, which turned out to be much longer than recommended for mammalian cells. The development of these individual steps allowed for the creation of a reproducible protocol for cytokine detection using flow cytometry in wax moth hemocytes. This will certainly facilitate the development of further protocols allowing for wider use of insect cells in immunological research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据