4.6 Article

Electrophysiological responses to conspecific odorants in Xenopus laevis show potential for chemical signaling

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273035

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grass Foundation
  2. Denison University
  3. Helen L. Yeakel Summer Research Fund at Denison University
  4. R.C. Good Faculty Fellowship at Denison University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The African clawed frog has a unique nose structure that allows it to sense both airborne and waterborne stimuli. Research shows that adult males of this species have strong olfactory responses to cloacal fluids and skin secretions of conspecifics, especially females. Further investigation will help identify the compounds driving these responses and examine the behavioral reactions to them.
The fully aquatic African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, has an unusual and highly adapted nose that allows it to separately sample both airborne and waterborne stimuli. The function of the adult water nose has received little study, despite the fact that it is quite likely to receive information about conspecifics through secretions released into the water and could aid the frog in making decisions about social and reproductive behaviors. To assess the potential for chemical communication in this species, we developed an in situ electroolfactogram preparation and tested the olfactory responses of adult males to cloacal fluids and skin secretions from male and female conspecifics. We found robust olfactory responses to all conspecific stimuli, with greatest sensitivity to female cloacal fluids. These results open the door to further testing to identify compounds within cloacal fluids and skin secretions that are driving these responses and examine behavioral responses to those compounds. Understanding the role of chemical communication in social and reproductive behaviors may add to our rich understanding of vocal communication to create a more complete picture of social behavior in this species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据