4.6 Article

Low rate of SARS-CoV-2 incident infection identified by weekly screening PCR in a prospective year-long cohort study

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274078

关键词

-

资金

  1. Seattle Children's Research Institute
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [K08 AI135072]
  3. Burroughs Wellcome Fund [CAMS 1017213]
  4. Institute of Translational Health Science (ITHS) [UL1 TR002319, KL2 TR002317, TL1 TR002318]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that weekly rtPCR surveillance did not efficiently detect asymptomatic infections in low-risk populations, while vaccination reduced the incidence of infection.
Background Asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections may contribute to ongoing community transmission, however, the benefit of routine screening of asymptomatic individuals in low-risk populations is unclear. Methods To identify SARS-CoV-2 infections 553 seronegative individuals were prospectively followed for 52 weeks. From 4/2020-7/2021, participants submitted weekly self-collected nasal swabs for rtPCR and completed symptom and exposure surveys. Results Incident SARS2-CoV-2 infections were identified in 9/553 (1.6%) participants. Comparisons of SARS2-CoV-2(+) to SARS2-CoV-2(-) participants revealed significantly more close contacts outside the household (median: 5 versus 3; p = 0.005). The incidence of infection was higher among unvaccinated/partially vaccinated than among fully vaccinated participants (9/7,679 versus 0/6,845 person-weeks; p = 0.004). At notification of positive test result, eight cases were symptomatic and one pre-symptomatic. Conclusions These data suggest that weekly SARS2-CoV2 surveillance by rtPCR did not efficiently detect pre-symptomatic infections in unvaccinated participants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据