4.3 Article

Study of Stark broadening of krypton helium-β lines and estimation of electron density and temperature in NIF compressed capsules

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/ac9017

关键词

x-ray; spectroscopy; inertial confinement fusion; plasma parameters

资金

  1. US Department of Energy by the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory [DE-AC02-09CH11466, DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. Weizmann Institute of Science
  3. DOE/NNSA via NRL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The time evolution of electron density and temperature in NIF compressed capsules during the 'stagnation' phase was measured using a high-resolution X-ray spectrometer. The inferred values of electron density and temperature were compared with theoretical calculations and other diagnostics, providing important insights into the fusion process.
The National Ignition Facility (NIF) diagnostic instrument manipulator (DIM) - based high resolution (dHIRES) x-ray spectrometer was used to measure the time evolution of the electron density (n (e)) and temperature (T (e)) in the hot spot of four NIF compressed capsules with 25 ps time resolution during the 'stagnation' phase. The electron density was inferred by comparing the measured Stark broadening of the krypton (Kr) He beta spectral complex with theoretical calculations that include ion dynamic effects, and the electron temperature was inferred by comparing the measured ratio of the intensity of a dielectronically excited Li-like Kr line to the intensity of the Kr He beta resonance line with calculations using the spectroscopic collisional radiative atomic model (SCRAM) and CRETIN collisional-radiative models. The inferred, time averaged n (e) values mainly agree with n (e) values from neutron diagnostics within uncertainties, but the neutron time-of-flight values of T (ion) are consistently higher than dHIRES T (e) values by 200-700 eV. The dHIRES measurements and measurement techniques, method of uncertainty analysis, and discussion of comparisons with measurements from neutron diagnostics are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据