4.7 Article

A novel long noncoding RNA CIL1 enhances cold stress tolerance in Arabidopsis

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 323, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111370

关键词

CIL1; Cold stress; ROS; RNA-seq; Arabidopsis

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Founda- tion of China [32102352, 31770275]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020QC030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing global warming, cold stress has become a major factor restricting global crop yield. A novel lncRNA called CIL1 was identified as a positive regulator of the plant response to cold stress in Arabidopsis. CIL1 enhances the plant's resistance to cold stress by regulating the expression of multiple stress-related genes.
With the intensification of global warming, extreme weather events have occurred more frequently, among which cold stress has become one of the major environmental factors that restrict global crop yield and production. Multiple long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been predicted or recognized in the plant response to cold stress, however, the molecular biological functions of most of these RNAs are still poorly understood. Here, we identified a novel lncRNA, COLD INDUCED lncRNA 1 (CIL1), as a positive regulator of the plant response to cold stress in Arabidopsis. CIL1 was significantly induced when the plant was exposed to cold stress. Moreover, knockdown mutants showed more sensitivity to cold stress than the wild type did, accompanied by an increased content of endogenous ROS (reactive oxygen species) and reduced osmoregulatory substances. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis indicated that 256 genes were downregulated and 34 genes were upregulated in cil1 mutants under cold stress, which were mainly involved in hormone signal transduction, ROS homeostasis and glucose metabolism. Our study implies that CIL1 has a positive effect on the plant response to cold stress by regulating the expression of multiple stress-related genes during the seedling stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据