4.7 Article

Critical water contents at leaf, stem and root level leading to irreversible drought-induced damage in two woody and one herbaceous species

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 119-132

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.14469

关键词

cell rehydration capacity; drought; gas exchange; membrane damage; mortality risk; water content

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant water content is a crucial parameter for monitoring drought-induced plant mortality risk. The determination of critical water content thresholds is important for understanding the process of cell damage and plant death. Regardless of the organ, a relative water content value of 60% leads to significant cell membrane damage and loss of rehydration capacity, resulting in irreversible plant failure and death.
Plant water content is a simple and promising parameter for monitoring drought-driven plant mortality risk. However, critical water content thresholds leading to cell damage and plant failure are still unknown. Moreover, it is unclear whether whole-plant or a specific organ water content is the most reliable indicator of mortality risk. We assessed differences in dehydration thresholds in leaf, stem and root samples, hampering the organ-specific rehydration capacity and increasing the mortality risk. We also tested eventual differences between a fast experimental dehydration of uprooted plants, compared to long-term water stress induced by withholding irrigation in potted plants. We investigated three species with different growth forms and leaf habits i.e., Helianthus annuus (herbaceous), Populus nigra (deciduous tree) and Quercus ilex (evergreen tree). Results obtained by the two dehydration treatments largely overlapped, thus validating bench dehydration as a fast but reliable method to assess species-specific critical water content thresholds. Regardless of the organ considered, a relative water content value of 60% induced significant cell membrane damage and loss of rehydration capacity, thus leading to irreversible plant failure and death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据