4.4 Article

Stochastic diffusion of energetic ions in Wendelstein-line stellarators: Numerical validation of theory predictions and new findings

期刊

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0120179

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme [101052200-EUROfusion]
  2. Target Scientific Program of the NASU Plasma Physics and Plasma Electronics: Basic Research and Applications'' [PL27/22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the first numerical observation of stochastic motion of 3.5-MeV alpha particles in a Helias reactor, validating the theory prediction. The study also suggests the possibility of preventing particle escape to the wall by optimizing the magnetic configuration.
Stochastic motion of 3.5-MeV alpha particles with orbits that vary between locally trapped and locally passing states (transitioning particles) in a Helias reactor is observed numerically for the first time. This validates theory prediction that the collisionless stochastic diffusion of these particles represents a mechanism of considerable delayed loss of fast ions in quasi-isodynamic stellarators [Beidler et al., Phys. Plasmas 8, 2731 (2001)]. The numerical calculation has also demonstrated a possibility to prevent the escape of particles to the wall by making the separatrix between the locally trapped and passing states closed, as was proposed in Tykhyy et al. [Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 49, 703 (2007)]. It is found that stochastic regions can vary from very narrow to very wide that occupy almost the whole plasma cross section. It is shown that the fraction of alpha particles with closed separatrix in the population of transition alphas can be considerable. Potentially, this fraction can be increased, and the number of transitioning particles can be reduced by a special optimization of the magnetic configuration, which decreases delayed losses of alphas by means of reducing the separatrix maximum radius. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据