4.4 Article

High-frequency radio-wave emission by coherent transition radiation of runaway electrons produced by lightning stepped leaders

期刊

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0102132

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA17040502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes an alternative mechanism for lightning to produce very-high-frequency radio signals through the transition radiation of runaway electrons. The calculated results show that the energy spectra and radiation powers of the transition radiation are consistent with the detection results. The proposed coherent transition radiation technique could potentially reconstruct the actual properties of electron beams in the lightning leaders.
Lightning can produce multiband radio waves and high-energy radiations. Some of them are associated with the formation of lightning leaders. However, their generation mechanisms are not fully understood yet. Based on the understanding of thermal runaway electrons generated at the leader tip, we propose transition radiation of these runaway electrons as an alternative mechanism for producing very-high-frequency radio signals. Transition radiations are induced when runaway electrons cross the interfaces between lightning coronas and the air. By the use of estimated parameters of electron beams emerging from the leader tips, we calculate their coherent transition radiation and find that the energy spectra and radiation powers are consistent with some detection results from stepped leaders and even narrow bipolar events. Moreover, our model also predicts strong THz radiation during the stepped-leader formation. As a standard diagnosis technique of electron bunches, the proposed coherent transition radiation here may be able to reconstruct the actual properties of electron beams in the leader tips, which remains an open question. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据