4.7 Article

Mesoscopic modeling of vapor cavitation bubbles collapse and interaction in near-wall region with a pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann method

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 34, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0099989

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [52109088]
  3. [52130904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann model has been developed to simulate multiphase flow with a large density ratio and wide viscosity ratio, and it has been validated to accurately simulate the collapse process of single and multiple cavitation bubbles.
A multi-relaxation-time pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann (LB) model was developed to simulate multiphase flow with a large density ratio (1000) and wide viscosity ratio (15), which are highly close to the realistic cavitation phenomenon. The model is validated by Laplace law and is implemented to simulate the collapse process of single and multiple cavitation bubbles. The simulation results are in accordance with the experimental results. By comparing to other LB models and numerical methods, the stability and superiority of the present model are morphologically demonstrated. The collapse pressure and the impact jet velocity on the wall are investigated, and the jet velocity on the wall shows a typical bimodal distribution, while only one perk is observed on the pressure distribution for a single bubble collapse in near-wall region. Moreover, the results indicated that the wall-bubble distance has a greater influence on the wall pressure than the bubble-bubble distance for double bubble interactions. Finally, the simulation of the bubble cluster indicated that the inner bubble has stronger collapse intensity than the outer layer bubble, while the side bubble collapse intensity is stronger than the corner bubbles. The simulation of a series of cases proves that the proposed model is a reliable tool to investigate realistic cavitation bubble dynamics. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据