4.7 Article

Flow control of a circular cylinder by self-adaptive furry microfibers

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0120296

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. [52008140]
  4. [51978222]
  5. [2020AUGA5710001020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, self-adaptive nylon wires are used to manipulate wake vortex shedding and improve aerodynamic performance of a cylinder. Experimental investigation shows that the nylon wires can significantly suppress fluctuating lift forces on the cylindrical model and modify the wake-flow dynamics, leading to improved stability and performance of the aircraft.
In the present study, two columns of self-adaptive furry microfibers (nylon wires) are placed near the separation points of a cylinder to manipulate the wake vortex shedding and improve its aerodynamics performances. The effect of extension length on the control efficiency of the self-adaptive nylon wires is experimentally investigated at a subcritical Reynolds number of Re = 2.67 x 10(4). The unsteady aerodynamic forces of the cylindrical model with and without control are estimated by the pressure distributions around the model surface, and the flow structures are visualized by the high-speed particle image velocimetry measurement system and the smoke-wire technique. The results demonstrate that the nylon wires can significantly suppress the fluctuating lift forces acting on the cylindrical model and modify the wake-flow dynamics. The instantaneous results show that the nylon wires can stretch the unsteady shear layer with both sides of the cylindrical model, thus increasing the vortex formation length and pushing the vortex structure further downstream. Furthermore, the nylon wires with an appropriate length are found to suppress completely the wake vortex shedding pattern of the von Karman vortex street. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据