4.7 Article

Direct numerical simulation of planar turbulent jets: Effect of a pintle orifice

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0113460

关键词

-

资金

  1. P. G. Senapathy Center for Computing Resource, IIT Madras

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of a pintle-shaped orifice on a planar turbulent jet flow at Reynolds number 4000 have been studied using direct numerical simulations. Flapping of the jet and low-frequency modulation of the KH instability were observed, as well as the presence of an oblique vortex pattern. The study also compared the near-field region influence on the far-field flow characteristics.
The effects of a pintle-shaped orifice on a planar turbulent jet flow at Reynolds number 4000, based on the inlet bulk mean velocity and the jet width, are studied using direct numerical simulations. Flapping of the jet along with a low-frequency modulation of the Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instability, in the presence of a pintle-shaped orifice, is observed. To compare the pintle-jet behavior, a free-jet is simulated as a reference case. The effects of the near-field region on the far-field flow characteristics have been investigated. In both the cases, the KH instability in the near-field influences the far-field jet, whereas the pintle-jet also exhibits a low-frequency flapping. In addition, oblique vortex pattern has been observed in the case of pintle-jet. The far-field flow statistics of the pintle-jet with a top-hat inlet interestingly agree with those of the free-jet with a hyperbolic tangent inlet. Temporal variation of the jet characteristics has been analyzed using spatiotemporal plots. In addition, the large- and small-scale turbulent motion have been studied using three anisotropic invariant maps (turbulence triangles, eigenvalue, and barycentric maps). Moreover, that the barycentric map gives a better visualization of the anisotropic behavior has been observed in the current study. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据