4.8 Article

Intrinsic Correlation between the Fraction of Liquidlike Zones and the β Relaxation in High-Entropy Metallic Glasses

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 129, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.175501

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [12072344]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [D5000220034]
  3. Natural Science Basic Research Plan for Distinguished Young Scholars in Shaanxi Province [2021JC-12]
  4. MCIN/AEI [PID2020-112975GB-I00]
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR) [2017SGR 0042]
  6. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  7. Research Grant Council (RGC)
  8. Hong Kong government through the General Research Fund (GRF) [City U11200719, CityU11213118]
  9. Innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University [CX202031]
  10. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [202006290092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the evolution of stress relaxation in high-entropy metallic glasses and reveals a direct relationship between the fraction of liquidlike zones and the aging process as well as the relaxation modes spectrum. It sheds light on the intrinsic correlation between the static and dynamic mechanical response in high-entropy and conventional metallic glasses.
Lacking the structural information of crystalline solids, the origin of the relaxation dynamics of metallic glasses is unclear. Here, we report the evolution of stress relaxation of high-entropy metallic glasses with distinct beta relaxation behavior. The fraction of liquidlike zones, determined at each temperature by the intensity of stress decay, is shown to be directly related to both the aging process and the spectrum of relaxation modes obtained by mechanical spectroscopy. The results shed light on the intrinsic correlation between the static and dynamic mechanical response in high-entropy and conventional metallic glasses, pointing toward a sluggish diffusion high-entropy effect in the liquid dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据