4.8 Article

Search for New Physics in Electronic Recoil Data from XENONnT

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 129, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.161805

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. German Ministry for Education and Research
  4. Max Planck Gesellschaft
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  6. Helmholtz Association
  7. Dutch Research Council (NWO)
  8. Weizmann Institute of Science
  9. Israeli Science Foundation
  10. Binational Science Foundation
  11. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  12. Region des Pays de la Loire
  13. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  14. Kavli Foundation
  15. JSPS Kakenhi
  16. JST FOREST Program in Japan
  17. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program
  18. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  19. European Union
  20. [860881-HIDDeN]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a blinded analysis of low-energy electronic recoil data from the first science run of the XENONnT dark matter experiment. By employing novel subsystems and increasing the liquid xenon target to 5.9 tons, the background in the (1, 30) keV search region has been reduced to the lowest ever achieved in a dark matter detector, 5 times lower than that in XENON1T. With an exposure of 1.16 ton-years, no excess signal above background is observed, and stringent new limits on solar axions, an enhanced neutrino magnetic moment, and bosonic dark matter are set.
We report on a blinded analysis of low-energy electronic recoil data from the first science run of the XENONnT dark matter experiment. Novel subsystems and the increased 5.9 ton liquid xenon target reduced the background in the (1, 30) keV search region to (15.8 +/- 1.3) events/(ton x year x keV), the lowest ever achieved in a dark matter detector and-5 times lower than in XENON1T. With an exposure of 1.16 ton-years, we observe no excess above background and set stringent new limits on solar axions, an enhanced neutrino magnetic moment, and bosonic dark matter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据