4.6 Article

Optimal control method of freeway based on tollbooths lane configuration and variable speed limit control

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127801

关键词

Ramp metering; Variable speed limit; Tollbooths; Cooperative control

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, China [20ZR1422300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71801149, 71801153]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M671173]
  4. Technical Service Platform for Vibration and Noise Testing and Control of New Energy Vehicles [18DZ2295900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an optimal control method for freeways based on tollbooths lanes configuration and variable speed limit (VSL) control. The method improves traffic performance and driving safety by adjusting lane combinations and speed limits.
There are tollbooths on some freeway ramps, and toll lanes can be divided into Electronic Toll Collection (ETC), Manual Toll Collection system (MTC), ETC/MTC hybrid toll lanes and closed. The traffic capacity of different lanes is different. Different lane combinations are set to adjust the traffic flow of the ramp into the main line. Therefore, this strategy can be regarded as a kind of ramp metering (RM). This paper presents an optimal control method for freeways based on tollbooths lanes configuration and variable speed limit (VSL) control. Firstly, cellular automata model and cell transmission model are used to describe the operation of toll plazas and main line traffic flow respectively. Furthermore, the freeway control methods are constructed by using tollbooths RM (TB-RM) and TB-RM combined with main line VSL control respectively to improve the freeway traffic operation efficiency. Finally, the proposed method is simulated experimentally. Results from simulation experiments demonstrate that the proposed method (i) significantly improves the traffic performance in terms of total time spent savings; (ii) observably enhances driving safety. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据