4.3 Article

Solid lipid nanoparticles for transdermal delivery of avanafil: optimization, formulation, in-vitro and ex-vivo studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPOSOME RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 288-296

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/08982104.2015.1117490

关键词

Avanafil; optimization; skin permeation; solid lipid nanoparticles; transdermal films

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Avanafil (AVA) is used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction, but is reported for its poor aqueous solubility. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) are lipid carriers that can greatly enhance drug solubility and bioavailability.Objective: This work was aimed to formulate and optimize AVA SLNs with subsequent loading into hydrogel films for AVA transdermal delivery.Materials and methods: AVA SLNs were prepared utilizing homogenization followed by ultra-sonication technique. The prepared SLNs were characterized for particle size, charge, surface morphology and drug content. The optimized SLNs formulation was incorporated into transdermal films prepared using HPMC and chitosan. Hydrogel films were evaluated for ex-vivo rat skin permeation using automated Franz diffusion cells. The permeation parameters and the release mechanism were evaluated. The transdermal permeation of the prepared AVA SLNs through the skin layers was studied using confocal laser scanning microscope.Results: Lipid concentration and % of oil in lipid had a pronounced effect on particle size while, entrapment efficiency was significantly affected by lipid concentration and % of cholesterol. The optimized AVA SLNs showed particle size and entrapment efficiency of 86nm and 85.01%, respectively. TEM images revealed spherecity of the particles. High permeation parameters were observed from HPMC films loaded with AVA SLNs. The release data were in favor of Higuchi diffusion model. The prepared AVA SLNs were able to penetrate deeper in skin layers.Conclusion: HPMC transdermal film-loaded AVA SLNs is an effective and alternative to per-oral drug administration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据