4.3 Article

Placing Brazil's grasslands and savannas on the map of science and conservation

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppees.2022.125687

关键词

Campo; Cerrado; Conservation; Forest-bias; Grassy ecosystem; Neotropical

资金

  1. MCTI/CNPq [442348/2019-3]
  2. CIEE (Canadian Institute for Ecology and Evolution, Canada)
  3. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  4. CNPq), Brazil [309709/2020-2, 303 988/2018-5, 305301/2018-7, 150510/2021-7, 309659/2019-1, 310345/2018-9, 303569/2017-8, 312486/2020-0]
  5. CIEE
  6. USDA-NIFA Sustainable Agricultural Systems Grant [201968012-29 819]
  7. USDA-NIFA McIntire-Stennis Project [1016880]
  8. National Science Foundation (United States) [DEB-1931232]
  9. Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development (Fundacao de Amparo `a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
  10. FAPEMIG), Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to improve the communication and recognition of Brazil's diverse grassy ecosystems by presenting the key drivers that control these ecosystems and synthesizing their main features and dynamics. The study also proposes relevant terminology and identifies key research needs for the conservation and restoration of these ecosystems.
In Brazil, the country with the highest plant species richness in the world, biodiverse savannas and grasslands - i. e., grassy ecosystems, which occupy 27% of the country - have historically been neglected in conservation and scientific treatments. Reasons for this neglect include misconceptions about the characteristics and dynamics of these ecosystems, as well as inconsistent or regionally restricted terminology that impeded a more adequate communication about Brazil's savannas and grasslands, both within the country and internationally. Toward improved communication and recognition of Brazil's diversity of ecosystems, we present the key drivers that control the main types of grassy ecosystems across Brazil (including in regions of the country where forests dominate). In doing so, we synthesize the main features of each grassy ecosystem in terms of physiognomy and ecological dynamics (e.g., relationships with herbivores and fire). We propose a terminology both for major grassland regions and for regionally relevant vegetation physiognomies. We also discuss terms associated with human land management and restoration of grassy ecosystems. Finally, we suggest key research needs to advance our understanding of the ecology and conservation values of Brazil's grassy ecosystems. We expect that a common and shared terminology and understanding, as proposed here, will stimulate more integrative research that will be fundamental to developing improved conservation and restoration strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据