4.5 Review

Perinatal mental health counselling programme: A scoping review

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 170-179

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.347

关键词

Counselling; Mental health; Partner; Perinatal; Pregnant women; Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study maps the evidence on a Perinatal Mental Health Counselling Programme and identifies its characteristics, participants, and outcomes. Nine articles were included in the final analysis, mainly from Iran, Italy, and Portugal. The programme varied in session numbers, duration, and techniques used, but all showed a decrease in stress, anxiety, and depression levels after the intervention. Mental health nurses can play a crucial role in facilitating these counselling programmes.
Objective: To map the evidence on a Perinatal Mental Health Counselling Programme, identifying its charac-teristics, participants, and outcomes.Methods: This review followed the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR. Published and unpublished studies, from 2011 to 2021, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish were included.Results: Despite the high number of articles identified, only nine articles were included in the final analysis, mainly from Iran, Italy and one Portuguese study. All articles referred to community health care centres and hospitals. The sessions varied between 6 and 16 and lasted 30-90 min. The method used was either individual and/or group, with weekly or monthly sessions or whenever deemed necessary throughout the evaluation. Different techniques were found, but emotional management, problem-solving, relaxation and mindfulness techniques were highlighted. Participants are pregnant women, partners, or family members. All articles suggest a decrease in the levels of stress, anxiety, and depression after the counselling intervention.Conclusion: Perinatal counselling programme have varied characteristics and mental health nurses are potential facilitators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据