4.3 Article

Molecular evidence of Monocercomonas and Acanthamoeba in the feces of captive reptiles

期刊

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 121, 期 12, 页码 3681-3687

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07677-3

关键词

Protozoa; Trichomonadea; Acanthamoeba; Squamata; SSU rRNA gene

资金

  1. University of Veterinary Medicine
  2. National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary [TKP2020-NKA-01, 2020-4.1.1-TKP2020]
  3. National Research, Development and Innovation Office [OTKA K-132794]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reptiles are commonly kept as pets and are important reservoirs of protozoa with veterinary-medical significance. In this study, fecal samples from 98 captive reptiles in an Irish reptile farm were examined, revealing the presence of various protozoa with potential clinicopathological significance.
Reptiles are frequently kept as pet animals. They are considered as important reservoirs of protozoa with veterinary-medical significance. At a reptile farm in Ireland, fecal samples were collected from 98 captive reptiles, representing 43 species of three orders (Squamata, Testudines, and Crocodylia). After DNA extraction, all samples were screened by conventional PCRs, targeting the ribosomal small subunit (SSU) RNA and alpha-tubulin genes of trichomonads and SSU RNA gene of Acanthamoeba spp. One leopard gecko (Eublepharis macularius) was positive for a not yet reported species/genotype of the genus Monocercomonas, different from M. colubrorum. Various Acanthamoeba genotypes were detected in six reptilian species, i.e., Acanthamoeba genotype T11 in Eunectes notaeus and Heloderma suspectum/horridum; genotype T4 in Varanus exanthematicus, Chlamydosaurus kingii, and Macrochelys temminckii; and the genotype T13 in Iguana iguana. Some of these amoeba species might have clinicopathological significance in both humans and animals. Our findings highlight the importance to monitor pathogenic protozoa in pet as well as wildlife reptiles, as a source of possible infection for animals and humans living nearby.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据