4.7 Review

A Systematic Review of Patient Education Strategies for Oncology Patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

期刊

ONCOLOGIST
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 2-11

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac206

关键词

cancer education; patient education; education materials; LMICs

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the literature on oncology patient education strategies specific to low- and middle-income countries to identify gaps in order to set priorities for future research. Results show limited research and heterogeneity in education approaches and evaluation in these countries. Further research is urgently needed to determine successful patient education and evaluation strategies to improve treatment outcomes.
This review summarizes the literature on oncology patient education strategies specific to low- and middle-income countries to identify gaps in order to set priorities for future research. Introduction Patient education can facilitate early cancer diagnosis, enhance treatment adherence, and improve outcomes. While there is increasing cancer burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is little research to inform successful patient education in these regions. This systematic review summarizes the existing literature on oncology education and evaluation strategies in LMICs, identifies best practices, and highlights areas which require further investigation. Methods The review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines and an a priori protocol. Four databases (Ovid Medline, Cochrane Libraries, Embase, and Cabi) were searched in December 2021. Two independent reviewers evaluated studies for inclusion. Using a coded data extraction form, information was collected about the study site, intervention characteristics, and evaluation methods. Results Of the 2047 articles generated in the search, 77 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four countries were represented; only 6 studies (8%) were in low-income countries. The most common education methods included technology-based interventions (31, 40%) and visual pamphlets or posters (20, 26%). More than one education method was used in 57 (74%) studies. Nurses were the most frequent educators (25, 33%). An evaluation was included in 74 (96%) studies, though only 41 (55%) studies used a validated tool. Patient knowledge was the most common measured outcome in 35 (47%) studies. Conclusions There is limited empiric research on oncology patient education in LMICs. The available data show heterogeneity in education approaches and gaps in evaluation. Further research to determine successful patient education and evaluation strategies is urgently needed to improve treatment cancer outcomes in LMICs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据