4.7 Article

Effect of drainage condition on the pullout characteristics of bucket foundations in sand

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111994

关键词

Bucket foundation; 1 g Model test; Pullout rate; Embedment ratio; Drainage condition; Drainage factor

资金

  1. Mid -Career Researcher Program - National Research Foundations of Korea [NRF- 2022R1A2C2009260]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of experimental tests were conducted to investigate the effect of drainage condition on the pullout characteristics of bucket foundations in sand. The results showed that the peak pullout load, peak suction pressure, and heave increased with the increase in the pullout rate and L/D. A drainage factor was proposed to classify the drainage conditions during bucket pullout, and it reasonably classified the drainage conditions induced at peak pullout load.
A series of 1 g experimental tests was conducted to investigate the effect of drainage condition on the pullout characteristics of bucket foundations in sand. Model buckets with a constant diameter of 150 mm and length-todiameter ratios of 1.5, 1.0 and 0.5 were employed with pullout rates ranging from 0.05 mm/s to 20 mm/s. The phenomena of heaving, gapping below the lid, and suction pressure have been investigated and discussed. The peak pullout load, peak suction pressure and heave increased with the increase in the pullout rate and L/D. The drainage factor was proposed to classify the drainage conditions during bucket pullout. The drainage factor is a function of the pullout rate and the inflow velocity. The inflow velocity converged to a nearly constant value defined as the critical inflow velocity. The pullout rates beyond the critical inflow velocity induced undrained conditions. The drainage conditions were classified as drained, partially drained, and undrained based on the proposed drainage factor. The drainage factor criterion reasonably classified the drainage conditions induced at peak pullout load.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据