4.7 Article

Optimization of passive flow control above the ski jump ramp of an aircraft carrier by CFD and experimental investigation

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 263, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112419

关键词

Flow control; Aircraft carrier; Aerodynamics; CFD; PIV

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Defense [IGB 99001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aircraft carriers are essential for military operations, and studying the aerodynamic flow on their decks is crucial. This study uses Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to analyze and modify the flow detachment caused by the ski jump ramp on the flight deck of an aircraft carrier. Passive flow control techniques have been tested to eliminate or reduce turbulence, and the results have shown significant improvement.
Aircraft carriers are a very useful operational tool for military operations. They are designed to provide service to aircraft at sea. For that reason studying the aerodynamic flow on their decks is essential. During take-off and landing maneuvers the aircraft can be affected by the turbulent flow generated by the non-aerodynamic surfaces that compose the geometry of the ship. Specifically, this study uses Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) applied to an aircraft carrier. The goal is to analyze and modify the flow detachment generated by the ski jump ramp on the flight deck that can affect the aircraft performances during take-off maneuvers. Passive flow control techniques such as holes in the ramp to allow airflow entering over the deck or aerodynamic devices added in the ramp corner have been tested. Different parameters of the devices have been studied and partial and even complete elimination of the flow detachment has been achieved. Finally, the numerical model has been compared with experimental wind-tunnel tests. They have demonstrated a full elimination of the flow detachment and up to 80% of turbulence intensity reduction above the ski jump ramp of the aircraft carrier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据