4.7 Article

Results of a 2-year lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes: the Reach Ahead for Lifestyle and Health -Diabetes randomized controlled trial

期刊

OBESITY
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 1938-1950

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23508

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R18DK102737]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the effectiveness of lifestyle intervention and medical nutrition therapy in weight loss among individuals with type 2 diabetes. The results showed no significant difference in weight outcomes and glycated hemoglobin levels between the two interventions.
Objective The Reach Ahead for Lifestyle and Health (REAL HEALTH)-Diabetes study assessed the comparative effectiveness of two Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes)-adapted lifestyle intervention (LI) arms targeting weight loss in type 2 diabetes compared with medical nutrition therapy (MNT) referral. At 1 year, LI had greater weight loss than MNT. This study reports outcomes at 24 (end of LI) and 36 months. Methods Participants (N = 211) with type 2 diabetes and BMI > 25 kg/m(2) were randomly assigned to in-person LI, telephone conference call LI, or MNT. The primary outcome was percentage weight change. Secondary outcomes included 5% and 10% weight loss, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and patient-reported outcomes. Results Participants were 61.7 (SD 10.2) years old; 55% were female; 77% were non-Hispanic White; and had mean (SD) weight of 98 (18.9) kg and mean (SD) HbA1c of 7.7% (1.2%). Mean (SD) weight change at 24 and 36 months was -4.4% (5.9%) and -4.4% (5.4%) in in-person LI, -4.0% (5.8%) and -5.3% (6.4%) in telephone LI, and -3.1% (5.2%) and -5.8% (7.1%) in MNT, with no statistically significant difference in weight or HbA1c at 24 and 36 months. Compared with MNT, LI arms had favorable changes in patient-reported outcomes related to learned dietary skills. Conclusions There were no differences in weight outcomes among LI participants compared with referral to MNT at the end of intervention or 1 year after its conclusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据