4.7 Article

Delaying mealtimes reduces fat oxidation: A randomized, crossover, controlled feeding study

期刊

OBESITY
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 2386-2395

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23566

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH [R01HL142648, R35HL155670]
  2. New York Nutrition Obesity Research Center [UL1TR001873]
  3. [P30DK026687-41]
  4. [T32 DK07559-31]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that circadian misalignment induced by delaying mealtimes shifts nutrient metabolism towards greater carbohydrate and lower fat oxidation independently of sleep timing and duration and eating window duration.
Objective This study investigated the effects of circadian misalignment (CM), induced by delaying mealtimes, independent of sleep timing and duration and eating window duration, on energy expenditure (EE), respiratory quotient (RQ), and substrate oxidation. Methods Healthy adults, aged 20 to 49 years, participated in this randomized crossover study under controlled feeding conditions. Eating window duration was identical in both conditions (circadian alignment [CA]: 9:00 am-7:00 pm; CM: 1:00 pm-11:00 pm), and bedtimes were constant (11:30 pm-8:00 am). EE, RQ, and substrate oxidation were obtained over 23 hours in a metabolic chamber on days 3 and 4 and days 14 and 15 in each condition. Twenty-four-hour and post-meal outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model including condition, day, and day-by-condition interaction as main predictors and sex as a covariate. Results Three men and four women (age 37.4 +/- 8.8 years, BMI 30.4 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2)) completed the study. Twenty-four-hour EE did not differ between conditions. Post-meal RQ for dinner and snack was higher in CM versus CA (both p < 0.001) with correspondingly higher glucose oxidation (both p < 0.01) and lower fat oxidation (dinner only p = 0.0001). Conclusions CM, induced by delaying mealtimes by 4 hours relative to CA, independently shifts nutrient metabolism toward greater carbohydrate and lower fat oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据