4.2 Review

Are we underusing peripheral parenteral nutrition? A 5-year retrospective review of inpatient parenteral nutrition practices

期刊

NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 118-128

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10903

关键词

gastrointestinal surgery; malabsorption; nutrition status; nutrition support; parenteral nutrition; peripheral parenteral nutrition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this retrospective observational study, the clinical characteristics of patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) were investigated. The findings suggest that peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) could be used more often in certain patient groups, while considering the indication and duration of PN.
Background Peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) represents an alternative option to central parenteral nutrition (CPN) for patients requiring short-term parenteral nutrition (PN). We hypothesized that the use of PPN could be increased in certain patient cohorts referred for PN in our facility. Methods A retrospective observational study investigating the clinical characteristics of patients receiving PN under the nutrition support team over a 5-year period was undertaken. Patients who received PPN were reviewed descriptively. Of the patients who received CPN, representative samples were grouped into those who received PN for <= 7 or >7-28 days (n = 100 each, randomly assigned). Clinical characteristics considered included indication, duration and referring team for PN, and nutrition status. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression model for predictors of PN duration of <= 7 or >7-28 days were derived. Results Only four patients received PPN for a median of 4 days, most of whom required this route because of loss of central venous access for CPN. A high proportion of patients with no enteral access received CPN for <= 7 days, whereas the majority of patients with malabsorption required >7-28 days of CPN. Being referred for PN following upper gastrointestinal surgery increased the likelihood of CPN use for >7 days (relative risk, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.7-18.9; P = 0.004). Conclusion Within our service, PN referrals for no enteral access may represent a group in whom PPN could be used in the first instance; those referred with an indication of malabsorption or following upper gastrointestinal surgery may benefit from early commencement of CPN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据