4.8 Article

OrganoidDB: a comprehensive organoid database for the multi-perspective exploration of bulk and single-cell transcriptomic profiles of organoids

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 D1, 页码 D1086-D1093

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac942

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OrganoidDB is a comprehensive resource for exploring the transcriptomes of organoids. It contains a large amount of organoid data and allows for different modes of queries and comparisons. This will help us better understand organoids and improve organoid culture protocols.
Organoids, three-dimensional in vitro tissue cultures derived from pluripotent (embryonic or induced) or adult stem cells, are promising models for the study of human processes and structures, disease onset and preclinical drug development. An increasing amount of omics data has been generated for organoid studies. Here, we introduce OrganoidDB (http://www.inbirg.com/organoid_db/), a comprehensive resource for the multi-perspective exploration of the transcriptomes of organoids. The current release of OrganoidDB includes curated bulk and single-cell transcriptome profiles of 16 218 organoid samples from both human and mouse. Other types of samples, such as primary tissue and cell line samples, are also integrated to enable comparisons with organoids. OrganoidDB enables queries of gene expression under different modes, e.g. across different organoid types, between different organoids from different sources or protocols, between organoids and other sample types, across different development stages, and via correlation analysis. Datasets and organoid samples can also be browsed for detailed information, including organoid information, differentially expressed genes, enriched pathways and single-cell clustering. OrganoidDB will facilitate a better understanding of organoids and help improve organoid culture protocols to yield organoids that are highly similar to living organs in terms of composition, architecture and function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据