4.8 Article

PGG.MHC: toward understanding the diversity of major histocompatibility complexes in human populations

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 D1, 页码 D1102-D1108

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac997

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the PGG.MHC database, which provides high-quality allele frequency data of MHC in Asian and global populations, as well as visualization and online analysis tools. The importance of this database lies in its contribution to the understanding and application of MHC genomic diversity in evolutionary and medical studies.
The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system, or the human version of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), is known for its extreme polymorphic nature and high heterogeneity. Taking advantage of whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data, we developed PGG. MHC to provide a platform to explore the diversity of the MHC in Asia as well as in global populations. PGG. MHC currently archives high-resolution HLA alleles of 53 254 samples representing 190 populations spanning 66 countries. PGG. MHC provides: (i) high-quality allele frequencies for eight classical HLA loci (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DRB1, -DPA1 and -DPB1); (ii) visualization of population prevalence of HLA alleles on global, regional, and country-wide levels; (iii) haplotype structure of 134 populations; (iv) two online analysis tools including 'HLA imputation' for inferring HLA alleles from SNP genotyping data and 'HLA association' to perform case/control studies for HLA-related phenotypes and (v) East Asian-specific reference panels for HLA imputation. Equipped with high-quality frequency data and user-friendly computer tools, we expect that the PGG. MHC database can advance the understanding and facilitate applications of MHC genomic diversity in both evolutionary and medical studies. The PGG. MHC database is freely accessible via https://pog.fudan.edu.cn/pggmhc or https://www.pggmhc.org/pggmhc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据