4.8 Article

Single-cell gene regulation network inference by large-scale data integration

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac819

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Shanghai Rising Star Program [21QA1408200]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [21ZR1467600]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20002150073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a method called SCRIP, which integrates scATAC-seq and a large-scale TR ChIP-seq reference to infer single-cell TR activity and targets. The method showed improved performance in evaluating TR binding activity and exhibited high consistency with TR expressions. Additionally, the method enables the identification of TR target genes and the construction of single-cell gene regulation networks (GRNs).
Single-cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) has proven to be a state-of-art approach to investigating gene regulation at the single-cell level. However, existing methods cannot precisely uncover cell-type-specific binding of transcription regulators (TRs) and construct gene regulation networks (GRNs) in single-cell. ChIP-seq has been widely used to profile TR binding sites in the past decades. Here, we developed SCRIP, an integrative method to infer single-cell TR activity and targets based on the integration of scATAC-seq and a large-scale TR ChIP-seq reference. Our method showed improved performance in evaluating TR binding activity compared to the existing motif-based methods and reached a higher consistency with matched TR expressions. Besides, our method enables identifying TR target genes as well as building GRNs at the single-cell resolution based on a regulatory potential model. We demonstrate SCRIP's utility in accurate cell-type clustering, lineage tracing, and inferring cell-type-specific GRNs in multiple biological systems. SCRIP is freely available at https://github.com/wanglabtongji/SCRIP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据