4.3 Article

Critical dynamics of relativistic diffusion

期刊

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
卷 984, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115944

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. European Union
  3. [824093]
  4. [CRC-TR 211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the dynamics of self-interacting scalar fields with Z2 symmetry near a critical point. We calculate the spectral functions of the order parameter and observe that they maintain their Breit-Wigner shape with non-trivial power-law dispersion at the critical point. We determine characteristic time scales and the dynamic critical exponent z, confirming the existence of dynamic scaling.
We study the dynamics of self-interacting scalar fields with Z2 symmetry governed by a relativistic Israel-Stuart type diffusion equation in the vicinity of a critical point. We calculate spectral functions of the order parameter in mean-field approximation as well as using first-principles classical-statistical lattice simulations in real-time. We observe that the spectral functions are well-described by single Breit-Wigner shapes. Away from criticality, the dispersion matches the expectations from the mean-field approach. At the critical point, the spectral functions largely keep their Breit-Wigner shape, albeit with non-trivial power -law dispersion relations. We extract the characteristic time-scales as well as the dynamic critical exponent z, verifying the existence of a dynamic scaling regime. In addition, we derive the universal scaling functions implied by the Breit-Wigner shape with critical power-law dispersion and show that they match the data. Considering equations of motion for a system coupled to a heat bath as well as an isolated system, we perform this study for two different dynamic universality classes, both in two and three spatial dimensions.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据