4.5 Article

Reduced TNF- response in preterm neonates is associated with impaired nonclassic monocyte function

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 100, 期 3, 页码 607-612

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.4A0116-001RR

关键词

neonatal immunity; Toll-like receptor; monocytes subsets; very-low-birth weight infants

资金

  1. Medical University of Vienna (Vienna, Austria)
  2. [13071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reduced functional response of nMO in low birth weight infants contributes to reduced TNF- response against bacterial cell wall components. Premature infants are highly susceptible to severe bacterial infections. The impaired infection control related to the functional immaturity of the neonatal innate immune system is an important cause of infection. Different monocyte subpopulations have been described and functionally characterized. However, data from preterm infants are scarce. We analyzed constitutive monocyte TLR2, TLR4, CD163, and HLA-DR expression in preterm cord blood. We further investigated activation of the signaling proteins ERK1/2 and NF-B in monocyte subpopulations after ex vivo stimulation with the bacterial TLR agonists LPS and lipoteichoic acid. The functional outcome of the stimulation was determined by the intracellular production of TNF. Furthermore, the phagocytic activity was measured via flow cytometry. TLR4 and HLA-DR showed a gestational age-dependent increase. However, activation of ERK1/2 and NF-B was impaired in neonatal monocyte subpopulations after stimulation with TLR agonists. Accordingly, intracellular TNF was diminished in preterm monocytes, especially in nonclassic monocytes. Premature monocytes showed high phagocytic activity, with significantly lower acidification of the phagosome. The reduced functional response of nonclassic monocytes of preterm neonates appears to be part of the diminished early immune response to bacterial cell wall components and is likely to contribute to their susceptibility to bacterial infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据