4.3 Article

Using machine learning to predict paperboard properties - a case study

期刊

NORDIC PULP & PAPER RESEARCH JOURNAL
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 27-46

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/npprj-2022-0065

关键词

bending stiffness; curl; decision trees; extremely randomized trees; machine learning; paperboard; quality prediction; twist

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the utility and accuracy of different machine learning methods in predicting paperboard properties based on raw material and process data. The results show that machine learning methods can be effective in predicting properties such as bending stiffness and curl. Feature selection is crucial for prediction quality, and the use of domain knowledge improves the reliability and interpretability of the models.
This study aims to investigate the applicability and accuracy of different machine learning (ML) methods for predicting paperboard properties based on raw material and process data. The goal is not to find an ML method that can predict all properties simultaneously, but rather the most suitable method for a single property. The examined properties are bending stiffness and the curl. Furthermore, the focus is not on the most accurate prediction model, but on the best model to interpret. The results show that ML methods are applicable for predicting paperboard properties based on raw material and process data, e. g., bending stiffness and curl in machine direction (MD) and cross-machine direction (CD). The feature selection is crucial for the quality of the prediction. Therefore, domain knowledge is needed to select the right features. This selection improves the model and ensures its reliability, comprehensibility, and interpretability. The self-implemented recursive feature addition (RFA) takes the features specified by a domain expert for the feature selection into consideration. It requires less computation time in comparison to the common recursive feature elimination (RFE). The extremely randomized tree (ET) was chosen due to its high interpretability and good results. It achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) for the bending stiffness MD of 0.913 mN m; an MAE for curl MD of 0.058 m(-1) (in a value range from 7 mN m to 100 mN m and -1 m(-1) to 1 m(-1), respectively); 0.474 mN m and 0.163 m(-1) (in a value range from 5 mN m to 45 mN m and -1 m(-1) to 2 m(-1), respectively) for the respective CD properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据